break on through oh the other side here

intitle:no.*.please.we're -sex - Google Search
ClicheWatch: No [not sex] please, we're [x] (GgW via mCass). //rw-whoa. ?. I'm thinking, wait I just googled that..Ididn't see it here first did I? maybe I did. why did I think of that phrase? THEN. oh my they can see me. you can see me?
to idiom my ... on 2006-02-02 .. YOU CAN.
the power of using an actually conventionally (communally) sensible -- topical -- TAG.
-just started with IDIOM right. and now there I am where I always look. it is a kind of overwhelming, don't know how to be whelmed appropriately. incredible to me, in credible. I know that's silly no not silly but small my little world (isolated?) -- Response, Response, my kindom for a . Interaction. it's too much.

no please we're - Google Search
No Bush Please We're Canadian. No Sex Please We're British. No Google Please We're French. (idiom -searchd bc of 1st=salon article)
to idiom ... on 2006-01-27

bc of 1st=salon article. "No Bush Please We're Canadian" was the title of a Salon article (which, continue to note, often uses my kind of cadence phrase idiom references as titles) ~a few days before ~ I'd seen it sbcy but only later made it over there but right I remember. (so) NOT from rw. he got it from me. aaah.

I was just going to sleep. opened a window to rw to look at later - has been maybe a week - out of touch with my - because the whole community a 0-w investigation - and I am tired and good to go to sleep and the www here is exerting less attraction good - but quick glance, I'll look at one or two links, just what my eye falls upon, oh I'll search meme (1) MemeWatch: crazy delicious (tHow) and cliche(1) : WAIT, I was just looking at "no please we're". ....
..... ..... ..... ..... ..........
ClicheWatch: No [not sex] please, we're [x] (GgW via mCass)
on Friday. that was 1/27. right.

uncool of me, I am uncool about this. is it exciting?