Tuesday, April 29, 2008

Radar: The Billy Letters:

1998:
Find out why the L.A. Times hasn't sent my newspaper —Charles Manson.
P.S. O-yes HI BILLY
Easy easy EASSY

(Manson attached the mysterious picture of a barn)
I bet you don't remember this —you dont even know where its at. HAHA. I got you there.
Charles Manson
Easy BILLY


2007
Hay Lo Soul, Hello Soul
Good To Too Two 2 here from you. I thought things got so good for you that you just 4 GOT WHAT you could of remembered or could remember what you don't forgit. Where is your mind—must you watch TV all day to go to night school to be a D.A. JUST to forgit I didn't take your money when I had ALL your credit cards locked up in
my dreams—Rife with Con Va Lution due 2 subjewgashen. My spelling got better—see when you go to school you learn to spell—oh well I'm just playing clown words to say I didn't forgit Hellbilly—Bill we always had good days + I'm glad your gonna be a D.A. Be one who works for justice + not one who wants to win win + and don't care if people didn't do rong—anyway be as good as you are when you git a job + don't let the job make you bad you make the JOB good.
Easy Charles Manson
You even typing now—Cool. A HILLBILLY that can type—FAR OUT.
I know if you payed what you owe you would be brok brok in like broak ones a panter brock + that they is a crook

plays on numbers, sounds:"billy" - clown words.

_______________________________comments:

-The end of the first letter talks pretty specifically about two key points. The first is that Billy "don't remember"-- notice the use of the word don't, even though everything else is in the past tense. ?what is in past tense? Find out, I bet, I got. no past tense. The second point has something to do with geography and space --"where it's at", "got you there". The remembrance theme is picked back up on right away in the second letter, and the explicit change from "hear" to "here" nice to here from you (and~'where' is your mind) show that the spacial theme is as well.

-I was also pretty fixated by the Manson letters. Especially creeped out by the photo due to the date 4/19. Pretty important day to the radical right:
* Day before Hitler's birthday, therefore lots of Neo-Nazi activities,
* 1993- Fire ends siege on Branch Davidian complex in Waco, TX,
* 1995- Oklahoma City Bombings
and... wait for it....
* 1971- Manson sentenced to death whoa that's weird.

Monday, April 28, 2008

az- Double Vision: Moral Philosophy and Shakespearean Drama -by Tzachi Zamir
.. Chapter: Doing Nothing ..
p172 Cavell [1987 Disowning Knowledge: In Six Plays of Shakespeare new edition released 2003 with new essay so, "in seven plays"] has read Hamlet in terms of a resistance to enter the world, attempt to 'hold back from existence'..relation delay & non-agent-oriented sense of self yes .. death wish linked w opposite wish to be internalized & met.
in resistance to taking on role of avenging son, Hamlet discloses a wish to remain undetermined, open-ended, unorganized. this resistance occurs in a maturing man -- one who, like Hamlet, is precisely at the stage of being pressed into moving from primarily potential agency (a prince, a student) yes my seven colleges Sylvia Plath's plums at end of branchs: to row at Oxford or to... to being this or that. We encounter an awareness of the residual pre-formed "that within" that Desdemona picket out and loved in Othello, and that Hamlet - will not - give up on.
Being or not being, rather than living or not living, is how he articulates his thoughts. Nothing is less determined than just being. well~. this marks the difference btw this solioquy and other despair literature of the time ~int (the Duke's exchange with Claudio in Measure for Measure, or Spencer's Despair).
Hamlet's father too is no father but a god there to be worshiped rather than loved - this indicates repulsion from actualized personalities. hm.
Hamlet's dying request that his story be only "more or less" related to Fortinbras ... "the rest is silence." ~Wittgenstein tractatus ends in ~ what we cannot speak about we must

p178 Genuine mourning should put a stop to life stop all the clocks, sweep up the wood - for nothing now can come to any good; deautomate and destabilize the move to action. Grief is a state that opens up and justifies lingering between being & acting, a state to which Hamlet is drawn. Taking revenge is to transform sorrow into actions. In a way it is like crying (Hamlet never cries). Modifying grief into action is to avoid a deeper form of mourning. The *refusal* to reorganize life yes around a powerful new state is a recognition & respect of that state. In Hamlet, lingering in this state also opens up the problematic nature of the very idea yes of an active organized life, the awkward relations between life and its regulating structures. We cannot know whether a preexisting Didion, On Keeping a Notebook ~ ppl keep notes are ppl w presentiment of loss philosophical fascination with the loss involved in becoming an agent yes. what are you afraid of? 'I don't want to be a person.' *a person.* causes Hamlet to use grief, or whether it is the other way around: his bereavement bringing out the philosophical experience. ~first, the loss. attachment, separation.
abstract concerns that underlie the play: that self-exposure and communication require an assent to be merely partially perceived catatonia ~ stop talking ~ very concerned with 'that is not it, that is not what I meant, at all.' ~ Maus: "Beckett said 'every word is a stain on silence.' ... Still, he *said* it." We become an object of reference it not thou for others thr being reduced to some of our roles as performing (acting) agents. Trying to remain undisclosed, doing nothing, is an attempt to resist this reduction. Hamlet is a play about such an attempt.
The reasons underlying the resistance escape the person involved and, the play suggests, must escape him because of what he regards as the essential defects of language the rest is silence - must be passed over in silence. Words reduce self into collection of descriptions that supposedly capture & stabilize what one is, enabling reference, signification, evaluation my upset at reading profiles online.
Hamlet's fantasy is Othello's nightmare: the former wants to remain undefined and be contacted as such, while for the latter such contact is too much, annihilating his established personality okay. his 'defenses.' One is a play about the wish to be rather than to be an agent, while the other is about the desire to be identified as an agent rather than to just be. okay, right. one protagonist embodies the loss experienced in moving from being to being an agent *what* is lost? (me). my life looks pleasant. but *I* don't want to do it. animate it.; the other the opposite loss: the pain of perception that penetrates beyond one's agency.

Friday, April 25, 2008

And Behind Door No. 1, a Fatal Flaw - The New York Times

Monty Hall Meets Cognitive Dissonance - TierneyLab - Science - New York Times Blog

OK so there are two issues here:

1. the Monty Hall Problem itself. should you 'change' your choice?

#Cognitive Dissonance in Monkeys: The Monty Hall Problem -By John Tierney, New York Times 8 April
cathy brought newspaper for me bcs talkd abt w ERosenbrg ?I remembr Chinese restaurnt West St.?/ 1in3 chance y chose correct door. aftr Monty opens 1ofothr2, y shld change choice bcs now 1in2 ~hmm.no,now 1in2 whethr"change"or not./wrong- cf blog mrkd abv
to z0804 item-archv

#Monty Hall Meets Cognitive Dissonance -TierneyLab-Science-NewYorkTimesBlog:
ok wh ch
ange problem to 1in52 chance reduced to the final 1in2 chance (deck of cards, y pick one, he takes away 50 th are not the AceofHearts, then you pick btw yrs & his: wh is the Ace?) does seem obviously better to 'change' choice.

and
2. what is Cognitive Dissonance Theory and how is Monty Hall Problem relevant?

#And Behind Door No. 1, a Fatal Flaw - Brijit Abstract :Supporters of cognitive dissonance point to experiments suggesting that once we reject an option, we modify future behavior rather than acknowledge that we chose incorrectly.
cogndiss= ignore info contradicts beliefs /good. article itslf not clear re relevance MH to cogn diss. choosing a door ~not correct/incorrect, not a pref. well cogn diss says aftr y choose a door y like it *bcs* y chose it.
-cognitive dissonance theory suggests that people would have a better opinion of the good they choose after choosing it than before.
-
mere act choosing btw two goods (A over B) makes people like A more & B less.

#(GIF Image, 190x574 pixels) “I don’t know th there’s clean that's what he said: clean, not 'clear' evidence th merely being asked to choose btw two objects will make you devalue the one you didn’t choose.”
Psycholog expl: monkey rationalizes initial rejectn of blue by deciding d n like blue.
Statistical expl: if monkey slightly prefers red over blue, there are only 3 poss rankings of green in 2 of wh will prefer green over blue /anyway


#dlcs notes on Cognitive Dissonance - The Monty Hall Problem
the Monty Hall prob may discredit cogn diss theory /?don't think that's right. cogn diss discredited not by MHprob but by analysis of any choice among 3 options [as per GIF: showing that if prefer A to B, there is a 2 in 3 chance prefer C to B also]

cathy: other door dead to me. ok I understand that. like my choices over-determined. so, after reject something I probably tend to affirm my rejection of it.
cathy: convince myself averse to it bcs I could not choose it.


ok so statistical explanation, regarding the monkeys choosing m&ms by colors, points out that monkey probably liked the color he rejected less than the other two to begin with. so that discredits the cogn dissonance theory that he declared it dead to him *bcs* rejected it when forced to choose.


M. Keith Chen:Working Papers and Recent Publications
Rationalization and Cognitive Dissonance: Do Choices Affect or Reflect Preferences? pdf draft Jan08
Abstract:
Cognitive dissonance is one of the most influential theories in social psychology, and its oldest experiential realization is choice-induced dissonance. Since 1956, dissonance theorists have claimed that people rationalize past choices by devaluing rejected alternatives and upgrading chosen ones, an effect known as the spreading of preferences. Here, I show that every study which has tested this suffers from a fundamental methodological flaw. Specifically, these studies (and the free-choice methodology they employ) implicitly assume that before choices are made, a subject's preferences can be measured perfectly, i.e. with infinite precision, and under-appreciate that a subject's choices reflect their preferences. Because of this, existing methods will mistakenly identify cognitive dissonance when there is none.

ok. but with regards to Monty Hall Problem, this would say what? it's not that people are attached to first choice (which they ought to forsake, according to the statistical odds of choosing the correct door), it's that they probably preferred that door to begin with?
the relevance of Monty Hall here is loose, I think.
it may even just confuse things to have brought it up in the article.
does Chen actually talk about the Monty Hall Problem in his working paper?
well he does once, and in blog post... read that to see if sth not yet understood.

Therefore, any paper which tests cognitive dissonance by testing that C is chosen more than B will spuriously find cognitive dissonance. Indeed, the belief that C and B should be equally chosen in the third round methodological flaw: not appreciating the 2 in 3 chance that monkey already liked C better than B to begin with is mathematically equivalent ok to a well-known logical fallacy, popularly known in economics as the three-door (or Monty-Hall) problem (for an excellent summary of the problem, see Nalebuff 1987).
? equiv in that.. ?we think that after Monty rules out one door for us, we have a fifty-fifty chance that either door is hiding the car ~ failing to appreciate that our information has changed
-the door we chose was given as one in three behind 1 of wh *was* a car.
-whereas th other door is now known to be one of two behind 1 of wh *is* a car.
yes but that is true of the door we chose, now, too. but it was not before. clearer with more than three---
maybe worth noting that we know about the other door that it *was* one of three and now *is* one of two - we know two coinciding things about it, whereas we only know the first thing about the door we chose, that it was one of the three.
hmm, yes that might really get to it, for me. with the cards, we chose one that was one of 52 cards in which there was an AceofHearts. we are now choosing btw that card, about which we know nothing new, and a card that is both also one of the 52 and that we have learned is one of 2 cards among wh there is that Ace. well but again ~ we know that about our card too now. ~

...anyway not sure I see what is equivalent. not appreciating that monkey (probably) already liked C better than B = Monty Hall Problem (what aspect?!?)

look at what Chen says for the blog post...

These studies have claimed that the mere act of choosing between two goods (say, choosing A over B) makes people like A more and B less — that is, people’s preferences between A and B “spread”. To be more specific, the free-choice paradigm that looks at this “spreading of alternatives” is one of the primary methodologies for examining cognitive dissonance and is considered one of the most established results in social psychology. And, I claim, every study which has shown “spreading” essentially makes a Monty-Hall-like error, by neglecting the fact that people’s choices aren’t random; that in fact their choices teach you something. Monty’s choice teaches you a lot about where the car is hmm, and similarly, people’s choices teach you a lot about which good they like. This is central to how economists think about people’s choices, and a fact that these psychology studies subtly ignore.
..Specifically, when we drop subjects who choose good B over good A, we may be systematically dropping subjects who like good B (more than good A). Ignoring this possibility is like ignoring Monty’s choice and what it tells us about where the car is likely to be. By throwing out subjects, a study “stacks the deck” of remaining subjects with people who like good A more than they like good B. ..I show that all of these results might be explained by the simple “selection” story that I tell here; that is all of these studies fail to fully take in to account that people tend to choose goods which they like.
..I have begun to conduct several experiments which are designed to separately measure the “cognitive dissonance” effect, and the Monty-Hall-like “selection” effect I explain above.

Thursday, April 24, 2008

LIFE: 6. "Powerless," 10/31/07 - rec.arts.tv | Google Groups

CREWS: She's twenty-two years old. Aren't they all on MySpace,
YourSpace, Facebook, Faceplace?
REESE: How do you know about that?
CREWS: Everybody knows about that. Don't you want a whole bunch
of new friends? Don't you want them all to know where
you are all the time?

Charlie trying to chat online with two fingers was funny. His screen
name was MANGOMAN. Geez, no wonder he was outed. Always go with a
pseudonym that's frou-frou, cat-related, and female-sounding to be
nonthreatening, like CalicoPrincess.

CREWS: You know, back when I was a rookie, all we ever used to
talk about, stuck in that car, was the Bank of L.A. shootout.
DAVIS: That was all anybody talked about in those days.
CREWS: Five perps dead, not one cop shot, and all that cash
gone. Eighteen million missing. The sixth man. Y'know?
I dunno. I guess I just like conspiracies.
DAVIS: Conspiracies, Detective, are how bored people pass the time.
CREWS: Oh, but come on, if there was no sixth man, then who took all the money?
DAVIS: There was obviously someone who got away with the cash. Where's the conspiracy in that?

What's supposed to link the money to the murders? Was Tom Seybolt the
sixth man?



CREWS: You didn't die. You survived what happened to you. You
lived through that and here you are. Did you ever think
you could live through such a thing?
There's real
violence in the world, Nancy. It never finds most
people. It found you.


mdupree d n transcribe or comment on Dani's monologue as Rick holds her at gunpoint and makes her drink. "All of it?" All of it. "Okay. I just need a moment.
I can do what you want, but you have to give me a moment. ...
"You think you're bad, you think you got a demon inside you? You think you've hit bottom? You don't know how far down this goes. "
5: "The Fallen Woman," 10/24/07 - rec.arts.tv | Google Groups - posted by MDupree:

ACT I
6:43

"JOHN": It's the end --
"3:16": -- of the world.
"JOHN": When angels die --
"3:16": -- it's the end.

CREWS: Just because the wings were fake doesn't mean she wasn't a real angel.
REESE: Isn't there an "off" button?
CREWS: I know she wasn't an angel-on-a-cloud-with-a-harp angel, but maybe she was an angel in the way we all might be angels.
REESE: We all might be angels? Crews, let me tell you something. You know, there may be a few things that I don't know about myself, but I'm sure I'm not an angel.
CREWS: See, that is exactly the kind of humble thing an angel might say. [Sticks an angel figurine on the dashboard. Reese pulls it off and tosses it aside.] That was very hostile.
CREWS: [To himself] Maybe she isn't an angel after all.

Where does one get the _Golden Field Guide to Spotting Angels_ anyway?
I can't tell a Power from a Principality from a Throne or Dominion.
Some angels are supposed to be avenging ones, so he's got lots to choose from.



ACT II
17:50

WILLENS: I, I own a company that makes industrial glues and adhesives. We moved over fourteen million dollars worth of product last year.
CREWS: That's a lot of glue.
WILLENS: Well, it's what holds us together. [Groans.] That's our slogan. "It's what holds us together."

I suppose it did. The glue made the money that held him and his wife together.

CREWS: [Reese grabs at the dashboard angel. It stays stuck.] Industrial glue. It's what holds us together.

I had to wonder if the writer started with the idea of the dashboard angel in his head, and worked his way back to the slogan, the glue, and therefore what the profession of the widower had to be in order to get the gag to work.


JULIA: Roman is not like the rest of us.
CREWS: Why is that? //
said not in the usual cop cadence but thoughtfully w emphasis on Why
JULIA: Roman has no fear.

Yeah, yeah, he's Keyser Soze. They're building him up into a cable villain on a broadcast show. Unless they're willing to back that up with his deeds, it just sounds like the hype it is. they back it up pretty well, don't they? with his crimes listed later in this episode, then his return appearance next season, then even being the final enemy that Charlie confronts in last episode of the series.
wh stays is my mind is Julia's other line here: When you reach out for Roman, Roman is not there. //MACAVITY! Macavity, Macavity, there's no one like Macavity. And when you reach the scene of the crime, Macavity's not there. (and I do not see that *that* was backed up, other than that he 'cannot be held' ~ by the police ~ bcs he is an fbi informant protected by them.



CREWS: A little freaky, right?
REESE: A little bit.
These lines didn't scan for me at first.
'scan' - I like that. I guess they meant that, as they entered Roman's club, they expected it to be lively and open for business as usual instead of empty and shut down.



ACT III
33:54
ROMAN: [To Charlie] Twelve years in prison, and you're still walking upright. Just between us, you killed that family, didn't you?

I gotta respect a guy who does his homework, but if Roman really thinks Charlie did the murders, he can't be as good at reading people as he thinks he is.

ROMAN: [To Dani] How's that rehab working for you? Down time's the hardest. You have nothing to do. The muscles get all twitchy. You can taste it in the back of your throat.
REESE: Shut up.
ROMAN: Got hooked working undercover.
REESE: Shut your mouth.
ROMAN: Took a junkie lover, too. Whatever happened to him?
[Charlie bangs on the table.]
...
CREWS: It was a pleasure meeting you.
ROMAN: And you, Detective. What if it was one of them [Indicates squad room.] who set you up?

A lot of homework.
nice. Evidently, Roman was just baiting Charlie when he said Charlie committed the murders.

CREWS: When Roman said those things, did you want to shoot him?
REESE: Yes.
CREWS: Me too. Did you see yourself shooting him?
REESE: Yes.
CREWS: Me too. You lost your faith because of the guy, not the drugs.

Maybe it's just me, but that was a non sequitur.* Most of the people that I've met who lost their faith did so at a younger age, and not because of a lover or drugs. But I guess we're supposed to take it as a given that Charlie's got x-ray eyes that see into the soul.
yeah. but*: I think there was a segue: from how angry she got (Did you want to shoot him?) to his understanding that the sore spot was the 'junkie lover' not the addiction. even if that wasn't the cause of 'losing her faith' - putting away her cross - it being a sore spot means she lost some faith because of him.


MAN: I've called the police.
CREWS: I am the police.

Moment of consciousness for the self?
right- it's said thoughtfully again (as Charlie says most things, wh is m of why I enjoy the show) and to his reflection in the mirror, or warning to others listening? I could make a case either way.

Wednesday, April 23, 2008



09-10-07_1216.jpg
Elliott Bay Book Co. staff recommendations

Rick still recommending Calasso, good: Ruin of Kasch Roberto Calasso is a remarkable publisher and a most extraordinary author. This book is a re-casting of history, leaping from the French Revolution to the Killing Fields of Cambodia and back to fabled African Kingdoms. Where legitimacy came from, how we went from acts of sacrifice to genocides and more...written with verve. Challenging but supremely rewarding reading.

Paul C not there anymore ~ full time (?) as Books Editor for The Stranger (great), I just saw after reading what he has up as his gmail message:"You writer on Norwescon had no true clue as to what the con means to many people. I for one never found in one fucking in the bathrooms and so one. I notice he didn’t even discuss the writers panels or the costume panels. Your writer was very limited to his or her very of the con. You should have someone who has an opened mind attend the cons and not just one." and looking for the article about NorwesCon I supposed he wrote in response to which I supposed he got this message, yes seems so. dear always funny paul.
Chicago Sun Times
Good Afternoon
Wednesday, April 23, 2008


-
Stars align with candidates : Last week, Bruce Springsteen endorsed Barack Obama for words from a respected artist -- but will they make president. In a letter on his Web site, Springsteen wrote, "He has the depth, the reflectiveness and the resilience to be our next president. He speaks to the America I've envisioned in my music for the past 35 years." Powerfulan impact on the election? Skeptics will remember that Springsteen endorsed John Kerry, too, and even lent him "No Surrender" as his theme song. (Kerry wasn't a hit.)

-
Cubs talkin' World Series in April? Why shouldn't they? : This is out of control. The lava-hot, first-place Cubs should stop the regular season and start playing one of those Sox teams, Red or White, doesn't matter ... in the World Series. Oops, did I say those terrifying words? Did I pull a Ronny Cedeno?


-
Zurich a superior city : IN this Swiss city's historic Old Town, a big blue fiberglass cow -- just like those in Chicago's popular Cows on Parade display in 1999. Zurich's display pre-dated Chicago's by a year. Zurich comes across as a city where everything is a little smarter, a little more efficient.. Just look at their water. You can drink it straight out of more than 1,200 of these decorative fountains scattered around the city. And get this: People swim in the river. In Zurich, business folks flock to the pristine River Limmat during the summer for an after-work swim. Then they spend the evening lounging around these waterfront lidos, enjoying concerts and cocktails. that sounds nice. The snow-capped Swiss Alps linger in the background of this sprawling body of water, where swans glide alongside sailboats. Joggers share the shoreline with cyclists: From May to October , 7:30 a.m. to 9:30 p.m., you can borrow for free one of 300 city bikes. All you need is a valid ID and a refundable deposit of 20 Swiss francs. Little wonder that for six years running, Zurich's quality of life has rated first among 215 cities around the world, according to the British human resources firm Mercer, which compiles its rankings based on safety, cultural offerings, cleanliness, recreation and other criteria.


(read the paper over a bagel at Salonica, pleasant)

Monday, April 21, 2008

Milton's Satan boldly announced that "the mind is its own place, and in itself/ Can make a heav'n of hell, a hell of heav'n." post below, quoted in Washington Post review of A Voyage Around My Room.

Richard II: I will people the cell with my thoughts...

Hamlet: [to Rosencrantz & Guildenstern, when they disagree with him re Denmark) Then for you 'tis not a prison. Tis nothing good nor _ but thinking makes it so. I could be trapped in a nutshell and count myself the king of infinite spaces, were it not that I have bad dreams.

Archimedes: Give me where to stand and I shall move the...


also been thinking to transcribe some papers, incl mine re above - specifically re Richard II, Henry IV, Henry "Hal" V. with reference to Hamlet, whom Richard II is like, in that nothing is good nor bad for him but thinking makes it so. not that you choose what you think, you are subject to that as much at to any event. Henry IV is not like Hamlet, feels the world to be sunny because the sun is shining not bcs he thinks he is. ~ that's how I recall it

and maybe I like transcribing.
enjoyed typing out pages from Machine re the Eohippus.
was int to type while looking at the source, *not* at the screen (or keyboard) - int bcs I can do it but I falter. and as typing can think about the faltering, is it when I try to think of pressing the correct key? is it certain movements with the shift key for example that I do not really have learned?and I can wonder at the working, as much as it does, of motor memory.
I am doing something without thinking it! I'm glad I learned to type. that is something I learned, and not on my own, right? typing class at Frankfurt Middle School, 8th grade I think
.
az- A Journey Around My Room (Hesperus Classics): Xavier de Maistre

int thing here is that I looked at this, for the first time as far as I recall, on Sunday a week ago. occasioned by a web order for it. and, today, opening to beginning of The Library at Night: Alberto Manguel (bcs packing it; and which I've been less than drawn to ~ too narrow, resembling that pretty hardcover book I had & gave to dc that was a ruminative retelling re Art, I think Rick at Ebbco liked it a lot, and it may be v good, but the narrowness I realized was off-putting, seemed to make the content also too-precious~ and books on books tend to be that for me already), this:
"I live among ever-increasing bookshelves whose limits begin to blur or coincide with the house itself. The title of this book should have been Voyage around My Room. Regrettably, over two centuries ago, the notorious Xavier de Maistre got there first."

Book Description:
Xavier de Maistre, a 27-year-old Frenchman was imprisoned in his room for six weeks, having been arrested in Turin after a duel, in the Spring of 1790. But with only a butler and a dog for company only! a dog and a human person!, Xavier de Maistre managed to fill his time by embarking on a journey around his bedroom, later really? really later? writing an account of what he had seen. Whether venturing from his bed to his sofa, or even to his mirror, he wears his “traveling outfit”—his favorite pink and blue pajamas. Out of his forced reclusion comes a captivating fantasy. This edition also contains de Maistre’s A Nocturnal Expedition around My Room. Xavier de Maistre was a military man, who supplemented his army career with short works of fiction.

Washington Post Book World:
... As de Maistre embarks on "the long journey we still have to make if we are ever to reach my desk"I do like that. it's funny, he reflects on the blissfulness of lying warm under the duvet or seated before an evening fire...
A Journey Around My Room and A Nocturnal Expedition Around My Room may seem mere sports, literary jeux d'esprit. And yet their ancestors and progeny are many: Milton's Satan boldly announced that "the mind is its own place, and in itself/ Can make a heav'n of hell, a hell of heav'n"Richard II people the room with his thoughts ... The English publisher Hesperus, which specializes in bringing out novella-length masterworks from around the world, deserves plaudits plaudits?* I know about laud ~ laudatory. for adding these two little masterpieces to our reading lists. 2005, The Washington Post
*hmm: laudes from Latin, plural of laud-, laus praise
Latin plaudite applaud, plural imperative of plaudere to applaud

.
[RTF] MAVE Dissertation, Lancaster University 1995 Being and ... File Format: Rich Text Format - View as HTML
He calls it zuhandenheit or 'readiness-to-hand', to be distinguished from vorhandenheit - 'presence-to-hand'. The vital point is that 'presence-to-hand'... what? (good: what's the vital point?)
ok...scrolling down ~halfway. new section here... has its own epigraphs like this from Karl Marx:


The thing das Ding? *not* Sache is conceived only in the form of the object of contemplation, but not as human activity, practice. Karl Marx. that's certainly apt alongside Heidegger's distinction
In Being and Time Heidegger aims to reveal the metaphysical presuppositions of the intellectualist-subjectivistic tradition, and to undermine the western subject-object dichotomy in order to renew what he saw as the central question, that of the question of being.

In the famous phenomenological description of the craftsman hammering in his workshop in Section 15 of Being and Time. Near the beginning of this Heidegger states that 'the kind of dealing which is closest to us *well if we're lucky is... not a bare perceptual cognition, but rather that kind of concern which manipulates things and puts them to use; and this has its own kind of 'knowledge'' (1961:95, my emphasis). He calls this 'knowing' zuhandenheit or 'readiness-to-hand', to be distinguished from vorhandenheit - 'presence-at-hand'.
The vital point good is that 'presence-at-hand' presupposes or is derivative from 'readiness-to-hand'. ok good.

(To use more familiar conventional ~and to me much less wieldy for thinking, like Latinate translations of Aris~ terms: theoretical or representational knowledge presupposes and depends on the lived background of practical knowledge, which of course is necessarily embodied.)

just talking to rui about this (via him on way out of room saying Is there a present? or only Now and then I threw out bit about H vs philos interpreting Being as presence. bcs had this near-to-mind, from what? from rereading bit of Guignon the other night, yes. was planning to revisit H & problem of knowledge. who I was much impressed with, right? and in contrast to Dreyfus whose way of framing the 'problem of knowledge' makes it seem a problem I do not care about.
had Guignon out, along with Wendell Berry to take note on: poetry at center of vast reminding, on Saturday. but started with Machine, novel by P Adoplphsen, then thought-planned to read about animals as disappearing, haunting. then reviewed novels I liked Seattle-Chicago.
everything leading to everything, vast, ok.


ZUHANDENHEIT VORHANDENHEIT OBSTACLE BROKEN.DOWN - Google Search

rui familiar w this part of SZ, about things "breaking down" when do not work.
then the thing becomes conspicuous. what is the O word here? I always think there is an O word involved in H's catalog of three ways (I think) things can break down. and I go to the book and either find one that does not seem to be it or do not find one. it seems to be a word, starting with O, that means stubborn. I think of obfuscate - to darken, so that's clearly not it. I think of obstacle, now getting somewhere. obstruprious... obstreperous! that's it, or at least that satisfies the felt requirements. does H actually use it? (meaning, does MacQuarrie-Robinson render a word of his as obstreperous? )
obstreperous
resisting control yes or restraint
noisily and stubbornly yes defiant
< L obstreperus clamorous, akin to obstrepere to make a noise at (ob- ob- + strepere to rattle)
...SASKETCHEWAN? KUMQUAT? sasquatch

talkin to rg, re white fluffy boot slippers bon gave me.
was going to scan recaps of 24 season 3 epis 1 - 3 . . .
searched 24 twop recaps and happened onto few things of int, esp the news now over a month old, that the TWoP founders left the site. huh! read about that -
plus older reaction to last years acquisition of TWoP by Bravo -

incl hits of two blogs coincidentally both cat-named (and generally re pop culture offerings) that I'll take a look around:
Newscat bitchkittie.blogspot : Newsy ramblings about media, candy, pop culture and politics from a woman who spent $60,000 earning a master's degree studying The Daily Show. hit was for March post re the TWoP founders leaving.
&
Cat Bus Express catbusexpress.blogspot nyanko and (ever so occasionally) totoro muse on tv, movies, and other brain-washing media offerings. hit was for old post Jan05 24 Recap on TWOP : The Television Without Pity recapper has a moment of pure genius when coming up with nicknames for the character who is the Secretary of Defense. DoD -> DaD. And then gives his daughter the nickname of DoDder. Heh. - nyanko
but good, the blog is still active & it's appealing that current top post, today, is of int to me
Alicia Silverstone TV show pilot : Apparently, Alicia Silverstone really wants to be on a TV show, and unlike most stars, doesn't want to do movies. She has been cast in [ABC pilot Bad Mother's Handbook] about a 32 year old mother, with a 16 year old daughter (Maeby from Arrested Development) and her 48 year old mother. It's basically Gilmore Girls, but with a really young grandmother too...

and this item: Whedonesque page re TWoP recap of Serenity. much praise for the recap!!
by Jacob. the link of course d n work (as site was revamped, changed urls, so links to the back-archive of recaps d n work. forums too? not sure) and only leads to the current twop home page. probably can find it with the Firefly recaps.
so read it and maybe see the movie ~ read wkp about the premise of the series Firefly ('naturalistic' future setting) which is continued in the movie Serenity ('space western' - so ~ naturalistic still?)
-note that 'Serenity' was also the name of the original pilot for the series. a new pilot was made and the original only aired later on. (so then it is not co-incident with the film? Serenity the pilot was chronolog at the beginning of the time arc of the series, right? and the film is after?)
-I settled to my satisfaction that the recap is about the film by searching 'Miranda' and finding it on the wkp page for the film and *not* on the wkp page for the Serenity pilot. (again, safe to conclude that the two concern different events, characters? )


meanwhile detours to
#idealist job site (listing via clare. wdc community cnnxns. research asst. tracking studies for mental health provider).
#Marquette bldg mentioned by joe. that's the downtown MacArthur Fndtn bldg. looks like the small store there is probably going to happen, hmm...
#big hardcov ModernLibr book passing through The Adventures of Amir Hamza caught attention "traditional storytelling at its poetic height" ... "seminal Islamic epic" ... "one of the great narratives of Persian and Islamic culture"

so am I hyped, well.

Will corporate ownership ruin Television Without Pity? - By Dana Stevens - Slate Magazine:
Will the conversion of TWoP into a network brand smooth out the idiosyncrasies that make the site...
—to paraphrase what Woody Allen said to Mariel Hemingway, his disturbingly underage girlfriend, at the end of Manhattan—I just don't want those things that I like about TWoP to change:
-Rambling recaps. Recapper Alex Richmond, in her blisteringly funny recaps of Sex and the City, free-associated on Sarah Jessica Parker's outlandish wardrobe: "Carrie is wearing yet another goddamn oversize knit rasta hat, this time in gradations of earth tones, as if Fraggles got in a turf war with Smurfs and wrestled away all the bright colors and demanded that now, under their rule, all large cartoonish hats mimic the colors of the earth, because everyone knows Fraggles are pagan and Smurfs ravers so respect it, yo." After the sale to NBC, will TWoP recaps be allowed to stay this weird?
-Talmudic forum commentary. Comment threads on TWoP can easily run into the hundreds of pages per discussion, with a dozen or more separate discussion threads per show. Clubby cult shows with small viewing audiences tend to develop larger TWoP apparatuses than smash hits: By far, the two most-commented-on shows in the current TWoP lineup are Veronica Mars and Gilmore Girls. really? huh. and by far? (what about Whedon, Abrams shows. LOST. ?) that's cool though. I've enjoyed those two forums quite a lot, maybe more than have for any other shows? I really liked reading TWoP comments about VM ~ also some single thread shows, like N/T ... Kidnapped ... now Life, although have not yet gotten that into the thread. Watchers of Lost and 24 sift through past episodes to speculate about the shows' master narrative.
..obsessive fan-chat exists everywhere on the Web, but I don't know of any place that
catalogs it as extensively and precisely. and thanks to the forum moderators—more on that below—the caliber of the discussion remains consistently high.
-Rigid Forum Moderation. TWoP readers listen [to the rule enforcement]. That, or they defect from the site entirely and go elsewhere to gripe. Personally, I'm charmed by the sadomasochistic dynamic between TWoP and its readers. The site's
expectation that its readers be thoughtful writers, too, is a refreshing change from the usual blog ethic of egalitarian mediocrity.
But how will these quirks play with the far broader base of viewers the site seeks to attract in its post-Bravo incarnation? In order to appeal to a mass audience, will Television Without Pity have to show a little pity after all?


TWoP Criticism and Commentary's Journal

Newscat: R.I.P. Television Without Pity

Sunday, April 20, 2008

CRITICAL MASS: The Critical I: Six Questions for M.A. Orthofer Aug 21, 2006 I recently located M.A. Orthofer, founder of the incredibly encyclopedic and useful website, The Complete Review, at his undisclosed location...
Q: The complete review seemed to appear out of nowhere, but suddenly it became one of the most useful aggregating sites on the web for book information and news, especially from abroad. Obviously this didn't happen overnight. Tell us how it happened and what your role has been?
A: When I first started using the Internet I noticed a lot of people were posting book reviews, but that practically nobody was doing the obvious -- linking to all other accessible reviews of the same book, as well as any other relevant information. So I figured I would try doing that (along with providing representative quotes from some of the newspaper and magazine reviews that aren't accessible on the Internet), which is how the Complete Review got started (in 1999). My role has been the dominant one -- currently way too dominant again -- in shaping the site (and providing content), especially in keeping the focus international.
Q: So who are the other shadowy figures of the editorial board of the Complete Review, and what are their relative areas of passion/expertise? Do you ever plan to put together a Complete Review atlas to the literary world?
A: Shadowy is right, especially right now (summer months don't help) -- as I mentioned, my role is again way too dominant, but others who have been actively involved almost all have a literary background, generally academic (grad student being the norm). A CR atlas sounds like a fun idea (but isn't Salon doing something like that?). But first up would probably be a reference work of great authors and their books that have not been translated into English yet!

Comment
-I am Swedish, and CR, along with Slate and Salon, have been the best guides I could ever get into the great world of English language literature. But I've also been puzzled by the strange lack of information on the guys behind the site. Someone oughta put together a Wikipedia entry for CR. still none that I find for either "compete review" or Orthofer. Thanks for this post, though!
-
Rebecca Skloot said...Glad you find CM to be a useful resource. And actually, there's no lack of info about the people behind it (who are actually more gals than guys): The names of the folks on the "blogging committee" are listed on the front page of the blog, with links to their personal websites. You can also find bios for everyone on the blogging committee by visiting the NBCC website. Just scroll through to find each name.
huh. Skloot misunderstood his comment on "the strange lack of information on the guys behind the site" as referring to CM = Critical Mass, the litblog of the National Book Critic Circle Board of Directors of which she is a representative here and which hosted this interview. when in fact (as is pretty clear - seems remarkable this was not at any point noticed & changed later?) he is commenting on the lack of information on the guys behind the CR = Complete Review site, main 'guy' of which being interviewed here. other participants are shadowy (names not seem appear anywhere on site) and Orthofer's name is not at all prominent itself; you can find it but no background information. which is okay, I kind of like that what you get is the reviews, you get just the voice.
from main page if click on About the Site:
The complete review was founded and continues to be run by M.A.Orthofer, and he is currently responsible for most of the material that appears on the site.
Though based in New York, the complete review tries and hopes to be global in reach, both regarding the books that are covered on the site and its audience.


haven't I noted all this before? yes:
above intrvw pgmrkd dlcs z0708 and yes same time on dlww
This review [re Mister Pip wh I just looked at a bit] here is notably good. I've seen this site before. today it strikes me as a very good site.
Complete Review - Welcome Trying to meet all your book preview and review needs.
I like this: Please note that these ratings solely represent the complete review's biased interpretation and subjective opinion of the actual reviews and do not claim to accurately reflect or represent the views of the reviewers. Similarly the illustrative quotes chosen here are merely those the complete review subjectively believes represent the tenor and judgment of the review as a whole. We acknowledge (and remind and warn you) that they may, in fact, be entirely unrepresentative of the actual reviews by any other measure.

but that's it? I didn't mark the "scratch deeper" bit? ah, on dlcs yes 14Aug08:
Complete Review - Editorial Policy of the Complete Review So: approach evth you see on the internet, including this site, with great care. Be careful what you believe: ask yourself why you believe it. .. These things we try to do here at the complete review, but we only scratch the surface. Scratch deeper.

also that month (though two weeks later on 1Sep not on same day) marked dalkey archive ~ chad post ~ three percent ~ reading the world sites . see z0708 + books and huh also Pretty Little Liars read that month. well. not so long ago. just last summer.
reread? Alva & Irva - how does it end?

Little, Big - Sophie the sister of Smoky's wife who finds dreams upon dreams in sleepy, and who Smoky loves in her unchangedness ~ as he loves his wife Daily Alice in her maturing.


Eagles & Angels - how did I so like a drug crime international 'politics of expansion' story?
az- Little, Big: John Crowley: "'On a certain day in June, 19_, a young man was making his way on foot northward from the great City to a town...'"

The epic story of Smoky Barnable -- an anonymous young man who meets and falls in love with Daily Alice Drinkwater, and goes to live with her in Edgewood, a place not found on any map. In an impossible mansion full of her relatives, who all seem to have ties to another world not far away, Smoky fathers a family and tries to learn what tale he has found himself in -- and how it is to end.

this is also on the shelf near the novels just catalogued, also a favorite read during that time (seattle - early chicago) ...but not of the group: not as closedly a 'novel' (rather ~ a tale, an epic, a story of story) and not one just happened to come across, not just published, not undiscovered - hardly - rather a favorite to many: 4 1/2 stars 114 customer reviews
in fact I came to it as a favorite of several coworkers at ebbco (eric I think, and paul c also?). then sent to dad, dimit, clare, dB. which puts me in company with az reviewers who say they sent copies to friends, keep copies to lend. dB took it up, talked with me about it. as he has other things, thank you dB. clare maybe did also tell me she read it? not sure, will ask, and not sure about dimit. I think dad did, to his credit I think he does always read what I give him eg Calasso before mr.brooks-ing (is that the uncle's name? Middlemarch. who would say "at one time I went in for that sort of thing") about it to me.

A huge, sprawling Tale in the classic John Gardner sense. Beautiful, allusive, and endlessly inventive. az list "Favorite Fictions"

-The book opens with a young man named Smokey Barnable hitchhiking his way from the City to a place called Edgewood, where he is going to marry Daily Alice Drinkwater. From this charming beginning, "Little, Big" goes on to trace the history of the Drinkwater family, whose story is quite literally a Fairy Tale that they don't quite understand themselves although they know that they are in it and of Edgewood, an amazing house "of four floors, seven chimneys, three hundred and sixty-five stairs, and fifty-two doors", which is a doorway to the Fairies. "Little, Big" jumps back and forth across five Drinkwater generations as the meaning of the Tale and their place and purpose in it becomes clearer, while Smoky (and later his son Auberon) struggle with their disbelief.
John Crowley's superb and gorgeous writing just sweeps you along. There are all kinds of odd digressions and even odder characters (including the Holy Roman Emperor Frederick Barbarossa). Many times I found myself paging back through the book looking for small references that I half-remembered which came up again with greater significance many pages later. yes I like that. The last 50 pages or so (as the Tale reaches its conclusion) are simply heart-wrenching.

-Edgewood is an unsurpassingly complicated house, built around the turn of the century, by an architect whose wife could see...faeries. They are the faeries of A Midsummer Night's Dream, embodying the qualities of mischievousness, whimsy, capriciousness and untrustworthiness. The faeries are also an odd mix of power and vulnerability, but their spirit is in decline. Much of what happens in Little, Big happens because the faeries must rejuvenate the old with the new.
The story begins with Smoky Barnable, an ordinary man who marries into an extraordinary family (the architect's great-granddaughter). It is Smoky who introduces us to Edgewood and to the subtle, but fantastic presence that his wife's family seems to take for granted. Smoky has a difficult time adjusting and sometimes he feels as though he's the only sane person in an otherwise insane world. The other residents of Edgewood see it differently; they somehow realize that a grand scheme is being played out and that once it is, their lives, as well as the lives of the faeries, will take on a luminous new meaning.
As we near the end of the century, Smoky's son Auberon leaves Edgewood for the City. It is, however, not quite the magical city that Smoky knew. There is a depression, nothing runs quite like it should and a feeling of dread looms over all. Against this background of dread, Auberon meets and falls in love with Sylvie. It is her disappearance that provides the catalyst for the final act of the faeries' scheme. this part I recall much less well. once Smoky not at the center, I was less attentive? could reread, I think.
Crowley conveys many emotions in this book: joy, sorrow, loss, lust but most of all, love. By the time you reach the end, you come to a slow but perfect understanding of why the faeries' rejuvenation is so crucial. This is a beautiful and beautifully-told tale.

-John Crowley's Little Big is a marvelously well written fairytale set in a bygone America that never was. Generations of the Drinkwater/Barnable clan live in a wonderfully mysterious house in the country whose grounds get larger the deeper you go into them and whose rooms and hallways don't always open into the same rooms and hallways you've entered from. The girls in the family commune with the fairy kingdom that the house is a gateway to, and the boys in the family spend their lives trying to figure out if the fairies are real. These details, and many, many delightful others are somewhat secondary, however, to the wonderful mood of the narrative, a melancholy dream state of the sense of wonder only children can seem to have in a world that in its smallness is the biggest they will ever inhabit. Crowley never hits a wrong note in the best of times and the worst, and the ending is supremely satisfying. lovely-

Saturday, April 19, 2008

az- Broken as Things Are: Martha Witt
Henry Holt and Co. (August 12, 2004) 4 stars
14 customer reviews not bad (I tht of this as a book not discovered, that maybe hardly anyone else had read - this I think is my favorite of the books grouped here)
-Told in the
dry, savant-like voice of 14-year-old Morgan-Lee, this tale of a Southern girl's coming-of-age gives a droll twist to the tropes of dysfunction. Morgan-Lee and her handsome, "unwell" 15-year-old brother, Ginx, are as emotionally close as twins. They have a secret language—a nonsensical patois that Ginx created—and share a running story about a brother and sister who are given permission to love each other forever and ever. Their mother is an overdelicate flower who's taken to her bed rather than face her son's problems; their father is kind but incapable of taking control; and their younger sister, Dana, has all but abandoned the family, moving into her aunt and uncle's house next door. Everything is proceeding as well as can be expected—one accepts, for example, that it's okay for Ginx to give his sister the occasional concussion—until Morgan-Lee falls in love with her childhood friend, Billy. Arch, slyly humorous and occasionally overblown ("I felt my jaw throb and swell, drinking the purple and black straight out of that warm evening"), this is an unusual, uncompromising debut.
-"I was the fire over which Ginx's soul became less blank, more legible." Morgan Lee's brother, Ginx, speaks in poetry no one else can understand; only Morgan Lee can decipher his curious rush of words, chosen for their sound and emotional impact rather than their meaning.
-A dysfunctional family in denial, the thin line between social acceptance and the taint of poverty and a lack of personal boundaries between brother and sister, mother and son; everything factors into this
disturbing and poignant coming-of-age tale, all the more painful for its immutability.With a mother too distracted to care for Morgan-Lee, Ginx and their sister, Dana, the children create their own landscape. Against a southern gothic background, Morgan-Lee, her brother and sister play out their fates, all of them branded by a lack of emotional support and affection. It is not until the children socialize with a very strange young woman, Sweety-Boy, and her half-brother, Jacob, new to their part of North Carolina, that their careful surface develops fissures. Sweety-Boy's world-weary cynicism acts as a catalyst for Morgan-Lee: prematurely worldly, Sweety-Boy is conscious of her own currency in a stingy world, while, in contrast, Morgan-Lee is still wrapped in innocence, grappling with unfamiliar emotions, knowing the price will be the loss of her brother and the solace they offer each other. When the siblings attend an intimate birthday party thrown by Sweety-Boy, the status quo is altered by the drunken exposure of naked needs blooming in the humid summer air. Ginx, Morgan-Lee and Dana are thrown into unexpected betrayals. The most keenly observant of the three, Morgan-Lee recognizes the storm on the horizon: "the prison of solitude that so often kept people together, no matter how unhappily, was constructed out of pure, empty yearning."


az- A Complicated Kindness: Miriam Toews
Counterpoint (October 5, 2004) 3 1/2 stars
36 customer reviews so *this* is the standout most popular
-In bleak rural Manitoba, 16-year-old Nomi longs for her older sister, Tash ("she was so earmarked for damnation it wasn't even funny"), and mother, Trudie, each of whom has recently fled fundamentalist Christianity and their town. Her gentle, uncommunicative father, Ray, isn't much of a sounding board as Nomi plunges into bittersweet memory and grapples with teenage life in a "kind of a cult with pretend connections to some normal earthly conventions." Still, she and Ray are linked in a tender, if fragile, partnership as each slips into despair.
-"People here just can't wait to die, it seems. It's the main event. The only reason we're not all snuffed at birth is because that would reduce our suffering by a lifetime. My guidance counsellor has suggested to me that I change my attitude about this place and learn to love it. But I do, I told her. Oh, that's rich, she said. That's rich." Nomi's uncle, "The Mouth", always knows what to say, and it never fails to be irrelevant and discouraging. But she values those whose love and concern go beyond the limitations of their prescribed answers, who can only love her and feel confused, without lashing out because they feel threatened by her ragged search to unite her family and find healing. Nomi's dad, Toews' best character, embodies this combination of deep love and confusion. He holds rigidly to the prescribed order of the community while
gently falling apart with grief. Ray wears a suit every day, even gardening, wins an award for perfect church attendance and listens to the radio hymn programme every night. But he spends nights secretly rearranging rubbish at the dump and slowly selling off the household furniture while letting his daughter see, with a sad and affectionate humour, that he doesn't know the answers. Even though I desperately wanted to tell her at the end of the book, "fly away!" I was moved by her dad's loyal attempt to encourage and empower her in the only way he knows how.


az- The Only Good Thing Anyone Has Ever Done: Sandra Newman
HarperCollins (May 27, 2003) 4 1/2 stars
8 customer reviews so this is not the standout most popular of these, as I thought of it
-Transforming that most pedestrian of documents-the business report-Newman has fashioned a first novel that is anything but by-the-numbers. Chrysalis Moffat, a South American orphan, has grown into a psychologically unstable young woman living alone in the California mansion of her adopted parents, both dead. Her brother, Eddie, "five foot seven inches of sheer depravity," returns from a slacker trip around the world towing a fake Buddhist guru named Ralph, and together they open the Tibetan School of Miracles in the run-down mansion, selling enlightenment to spiritually destitute Californians. Was their father in the CIA? What, exactly, was he doing in South America when he adopted Chrysalis? The novel is full of false turns, fake names and jaw-dropping coincidences, all slotted neatly together in Newman's blunt, wry prose. This is a virtuoso performance, if it sometimes reads like wallowing in cancer, suicide, incest, mental illness.
-The author uses numbered and lettered lists and odd formatting that I expected to find annoying after a while, but the effect does not feel contrived or `writerly'. It's
poetic, clever, funny, and tragic. The characters are, to put it simplistically, all deeply messed up by a lack of love and by their experiences of loss and abandonment. They are, therefore, all doomed. In the meantime, they live twisted and fascinating lives.
-Style is the chief hook here, as Chrysalis's dry tone and seemingly straightforward narration (often organized into the numbered paragraphs of a formal report) provide comic counterpoint to numerous over-the-top, out-of-sequence subplots involving--among other things--biological weapons, alien abduction, divine visitations, professional gamblers, guerilla war, unrequited love, and suicide. deft and edgy first novel.


az- Built in a Day: Steven Rinehart
Doubleday (July 22, 2003) 3 1/2 review
5 customer reviews
-Andrew, the antihero of this
blackly humorous novel, is still in college in his 30s, has a job as a youth counselor that involves nothing more than hanging out with teens all day..
-Andrew Bergman, self-described "underachiever and alcoholic," relates the story of his thirty-second year, during which he is married, then widowed, then loses everything except one friend. The setting, a small midwestern college city, shapes the story: a good thing, since the plot packs in enough dire happenings and bizarre behavior to fuel several novels, leaving more than one dangling subplot. The characters, representing the oddball Andrew's self-centered lifestyle, are a weird melange: bar maids and bar owners; randy, smart, mouthy teens; a sprinkling of social workers; a couple of tough older ladies; several academics (including his outrageous, Shakespeare-loving mother); and assorted townsfolk. As the character list indicates, Rinehart can write with humor. He has a talent for
apt, witty phrases and, at least at the beginning of the book, integrates amusing scenes with the bathos. The slacker tone, vulgar language, and some graphic sex suggest that this book will appeal most strongly to readers of modern, edgy fiction.
-finds himself charged with the care of his dead wife's son and foster-daughter .. the story he finds himself in builds to bang-up climax, with a sweet little resolution that gives the reader some hope that Andrew is climbing out his hole, and might even be better for it when he gets there.
-As I neared the end I thought, "Sure, it's a great read, but what about the ending? Can he make me believe in the ending?" And yes. The ending is great. Surprising and inevitable, as a good ending should be.



az- An Everyday Savior: Kathryn Larrabee
Thunder's Mouth Press (June 10, 2002) 4 1/2 stars
7 customer reviews
-a moving debut novel.
- has humor, tension, and a real move along story.
-Understated integrity and quiet dignity are the hallmarks of Kathryn Larrabee's debut novel, An everyday Savior. Harley Cookson has been married barely six months to his Russian bride, Sonia, when he must bring his ailing mother to live with them. A chance encounter with an old girlfriend, Lynette, gives him another reason to worry - it seems Lynette's husband has been beating her. Larrabee's sure hand with her material and her feel for the rituals of home life make this a richly textured and rewarding novel.
-A charmingly simple story with complex layers. The male point of view is refreshing and captivating. I loved the descriptions of the rural settings and the relationship between Harley and Sonia. Sonia prompted her husband to do the right thing even when that action might be against her interests. I especially found the ending provocative; who are the saviors in our lives?
this is odd one in the group? about an adult, not arrested in developement. not esp about loss, abandonment?

__________________
all these authors American? yes I think (Toews is Canadian).
all first novels? yes.. except Toews: Complicated Kindness is her third novel.
and all more or less coming-of-age stories? about adolescents (Broken, Complicated Kindness) or young adults (Only Good Thing, Built in a Day, Everyday Savior no this is story of a man in -and re?- middle-age~)
Only Good Thing & Built in a Day are "edgy" - the other three are not, right? Nomi's voice is irreverent and Morgan-Lee's is dry; neither style is edgy. and Everyday Savior least of all.
I don't know if a novel can be edgy and be great. ~to me that is. edgy is Chuck Palahniuk. I liked esp his
Lullaby, but feel something to be cheap about it ~


az- Summerhouse, Later: Stories: Judith Hermann (German)
Harper Perennial (April 1, 2003) 4 1/2 stars 2 customer reviews
-melancholy self-absorption of Hermann's characters -youngish to middle-aged Berliners- restless, their desires oblique and unfocused, their memories more real than their real-life encounters.
-dream-like -suspended, remote


az- Eagles and Angels: Juli Zeh (German)
Granta Books (September 2003) 4 stars 1 customer review
-A haze of drug addiction and anomie hangs over this bleak tale of obsessive love and underworld dealings, the first novel by a young German writer. When Max, a successful Viennese attorney in his early 30s, is left desperate and forlorn following the suicide of his girlfriend, Jessie, he calls Clara, a 23-year-old radio host. She wants his story for her psychology dissertation. In exchange for being put up at her apartment, Max agrees to talk into a DAT recorder between lines of coke. As he tells it, he first met Jessie at boarding school, where she was dating his roommate, Shershah, and dealing coke for her sinister father, Herbert, and brother, Ross. Tiny and unstable, Jessie reenters Max's life 12 years later and sucks him into her downward spiral. As Max continues spinning his tale on tape, he begins to uncover larger conspiracies and connections that threaten not only him but also his odd partnership with Clara and his memories of Jessie. Folding the story of Max's tortured love for both women into a larger chronicle of European drug smuggling and related war crimes, Zeh weaves a nightmarishly effective tale of personal and societal collapse. doesn't sound like my kind of book. but it was-
-Zeh's intriguing debut is part crime drama, part love story, and part drug novel, and it functions well as each of these. What makes it a great book--and probably why it won last year's German Book Award for most successful debut novel--is its skillful yet subtle integration of the politics of expansion into both foreground and background.


az- Troll: A Love Story: Johanna Sinisalo (Finnish)
Grove Press (February 19, 2004) 4 stars 17 customer reviews
-This strange, captivating novel, winner of Finland's top prize for fiction, is set in a familiar world just slightly askew from our own. The basic premise is quite simple, in the book, trolls are real creatures found primarily in northern reaches of Scandinavia and Russia, and are treated as a rare species of animal. They were definitively "discovered" in 1907, but have since remained elusive to science, and little is known about them. Although they tend to keep far away from human settlements, the book opens in a city (presumably Helsinki) with a good-looking young gay photographer (Mikael) coming across a sick young troll late a night. Stumbling home drunk and depressed from a failed night of wooing, Mikael's judgment is poor and he brings the creature into his apartment. ..As the nursing succeeds, the troll grows healthier and stronger, and there becomes a noticeable juniper-berry odor in the apartment. This is the scent of the troll's pheromones, and Mikael becomes steadily more infatuated with the creature, who reciprocates and treats him as the Alpha-male; Mikael is slow to realize the consequences of this, with horrible results.
The book does a nice job of using fairy tales and becoming one itself - an entertaining fable on the relationship of the natural world to man's world.
-The author raises questions about man's relationship with wild creatures-- how much we know or don't know about them and what they know about us. She seems to say something about the animalistic tendences that lie deeply hidden in the most civilized of us just waiting to be let loose.
-The story is fascinating. If I met the troll Pessi, I'd have adopted him too.


az- The Tooth Fairy: A Novel: Graham Joyce (English)
Tor Books (December 15, 1998) 4 stars. 52 customer reviews
-The disquietude in Graham Joyce's coming-of-age tale is that of having too much power as a child--the kind of power that turns your slightest wishes into mayhem.
-Seven-year-old Sam first lays eyes on the Tooth Fairy, oddly dressed and smelling of horse's sweat and chamomile, in the middle of the night after he has stashed a tooth under his pillow. Over the years, the fairy becomes a fixture in his life. No one else can see or hear this odd creature, who is sometimes male, sometimes female and alternately coy, cruel, cuddly. Joyce engagingly describes the boys' childhood experiences -sampling drugs, toying with explosives, worrying over acne- and carefully portrays their childlike stoicism in the face of several horrifying tragedies. Sam worries that the Tooth Fairy, who grows menacing and sexually demanding, is responsible for those calamities.
-The underlying question in The Tooth Fairy isn't whether or not the Fairy is real (although it is a minor subplot), but if the Fairy is a good or evil influence. Late in the book, you realize that the Fairy, real or not, stands as a metaphor for certain aspects of being a child. On the surface, there is a simple story about a young boy plagued by a childhood demon, but underneath runs a Jungian psychodrama saying, in effect, that we all have these demons, and dealing with them is a process of maturing.
-a very creepy, touching, and perfectly bizarre book.


az- Where Does Kissing End?: Kate Pullinger
(Canadian born, moved to London)
Serpent's Tail (October 1, 1995) 5 stars. 1 customer review
-Pullinger has an interesting, blunt style...
-Sensual and fascinating: 'Kissing' is the story of the curious relationship shared by two twentysomethings: an illegitimate child-woman named Mina, and Stephen, the man obsessively in love with her. Occasionally explicit in language but subtle in its eroticism, it is an engrossing study of two people's growth, from youth to adulthood, together and apart from one another. A beautiful short novel that arouses as it draws blood; highly recommended.


az-Alva & Irva: The Twins Who Saved a City: Edward Carey (English)
Harcourt (March 1, 2003) 5 stars. 5 customer reviews
-English playwright Edward Carey's novel Alva & Irva is an inventive tale with a vein of half-ironic sadness running through it that brings to mind the works of other European masters of this genre, namely Gunter Grass, Italio Calvino, and Milan Kundera. what genre? imaginative fiction.. with vein of ironic sadness running through? Alva & Irva is in part the life story of eccentric twin girls who create a plasticine model of their small European city and also a guidebook to the fictional city of Entralla, a place so like countless small, undistinguished cities in Europe (right down to its invented brush with history--a rumor that Napoleon had spent a night there) that one could probably use Alva & Irva as an actual guidebook, standing in any number of piazzas, plazas, and squares, and glancing around at the cafes, cathedrals, chapels, post offices, and municipal buildings.
-In the spirit of his well-received first novel, the modern gothic Observatory Mansions I think Paul Constant read & liked this?, Carey crafts another fantastic tale, this one revolving around a pair of lonely identical twins. Alva and Irva live in the imaginary (vaguely Nordic) city of Entralla. Their father dies the same day they are born, and the twins are brought up by their reclusive mother. Inseparable from the beginning, they are also polar opposites: Alva, the novel's narrator, longs to see the world, and Irva, her silent twin, is content to stay home forever. When they are still very young, a gift of plasticine inspires them to build a model of their street; soon they are building an imaginary city, Alvairvalla. But then they grow older, and Alva craves independence, finally taking a job at the Entralla post office. Shut up in her room, Irva withdraws further, and Alva torments her by having herself tattooed all over with a map of the world. But in the end the tattoo haunts her and catapults her back into her sister's greedy embrace. Together, the two embark on their greatest plasticine project yet-a model of the whole city-little suspecting how useful it will become after disaster strikes Entralla. Structured around whimsical guidebook entries describing the landmarks of Entralla, and illustrated with photographs of buildings molded out of plasticine (Carey created his own two-by-three-foot model of the city), the novel casts a powerful if sometimes stifling spell.
-Poignant is the closest I can come to explaining the tone of the book, but all is not as sad as that term might suggest. Like his Observatory Mansions, it's all about the people. Please read this book. It is a one of a kind.
-This is a story of place. And it is one I found particularly touching. You will feel the same if you've ever walked aimlessly through a city's streets as you wondered what it would be like to live there, or - if you lived there - wondered what it would be to leave. Edward Carey has found the perfect metaphors for the alternate yearnings, to stay or go, in his characters Irva and Alva. The real brilliance of his story, though, lies in how he manages to illuminate every emotional aspect of how we regard the places we are and may go, and he does so in such an unforced and natural way that we've hardly realized the depth of his contemplation by the book's end. His touch is light, but the feeling is strong...Alva documents the outside in photographs and measurements while Irva remains inside and sculpts. The tiny buildings "may not have been mathematically accurate, but they were, let there be no doubt about this, emotionally precise." It is emotional accuracy that matters. "Miniature things move people." In Carey's world and in real life, it is because the perspective granted by things reduced focuses the emotions we associate with those things. When Alva's and Irva's sculpture is reluctantly displayed to a scarred populace, both the smallness and the significance of the peoples' lives are somehow simultaneously grasped. These oppositions of place are difficult to hold in the same hand. When the writer of this guidebook is revealed who? I don't remember, the significance of small lives is once again emphasized and along with it the unavoidable bitterness of travelling alone in a vast world. This final revelation is devastating and beautiful in a novel full of contradictions. I don't ever expect to read any other book that so perfectly evokes my own feelings towards the places I have been. wow good review.
-I would say Alva and Irva is a little more solemn than Carey's first novel, but certainly a good read. The last portion had me talking out loud and murmuring, "Oh god. Oh my God. Oh no!" You don't believe the lengths the characters go to to secure themselves against their fears and angers until you are on to the next shock.
-An extended meditation on the sense of place, an inquiry into what it means to belong, the book is written alternately as a guidebook for tourists coming to Entralla, and as the memoir of Alva Dapps, the more outgoing of the two sisters. It comes complete with a detailed map, recommendations of where to stay and where to dine, which trolley bus to take to which destination; and the sad inner struggles of two odd and lonely girls who never belong anywhere.


. . .
anomie. drug story, love story. bleak. creatures: troll, tooth fairy, vampire. horse sweat, chamomile, juniper berries, blood, dirt. the woods. under the spell of drugs or a call to wildness - a magical creature or a vampiric curse. or eros. eros-magic. under a spell. place. yearnings. together or apart. stay or go. twins.
. . .


Archive