I want my 'ontologies' well classification systems to be explicitly useful - where pleasure is one if not only use - means classification personal idiosyncratic - but not ok right if the use is communicatn vis DSM where phenomelogical suits me

want ontology logos ontos th thought of Sein to be that - not classification of beings
wh do I ever see as having truth value nah description so ok can be more clear
articulate gains understand
but its always of same kind: description (sjc lab senior yr round table dB) - not sth else sth essential - wh is a word I also dont like (sjc aaron: are you translating ousia, or..? no man I am actually using the english word)

guess I can enjoy technical exercise toward making exhaustive - either / or
gives where to start and how to go - otherwise and else dont try exhaustive as if everyth really is either this or that - in Your classification system - really - theres no really here

there are things in this world not dreamed of in your philosophy Horatio

again dreamed