The Iconophile's Celebrity Pantheon: This site is the auto-erotically produced love-child of Golem
seen that name before - bcs seen this site maybe - or is Golem involved in twop/fametracker?
Also Sprach Der Iconophile:
There's a site called "Used Tissues" that looks and reads an awful lot like The Iconophile. Are you the webmaster of both sites? If not, you should know that "Used Tissues" is totally ripping you off.
Well, I suppose it's time I fess up to what's been glaringly obvious to many for some time: The Iconophile and Used Tissues are run by the same geek. While The Iconophile was and is my main focus, Used Tissues was created as a kind of backup site, just in case something bad happened to The Iconophile. (With all the threats and sting operations I was dealing with, it seemed a pretty good idea at the time to maintain a separate site, identity, and taste in celebrities.)
But as laziness is the mother of invention, so it is the mother of mergers: maintaining both sites started taking up so much time that I scarcely had a moment for anything else, and so have at long last decided to fuse the two already bloated sites into one megasite. As a result, The Iconophile has inherited some actresses that don't really fit with the rest of its featured celebrities (eg., Jennifer Aniston), and a few that I'm at best indifferent to (eg., Natalie Raitano). Serves me right, I guess, for trying to beat certain people at their own cloak-and-daggerish games.
I just wanted to know where you got the notion that Angelina's boobs are fake. Because they sure as hell look real to me.
I can't believe I had to make an FAQ topic out of this.
I'm not sure what's going on out there in cyberland, but for some reason there's always a throng of people rushing to Angelina's defense on this issue every time she has a new film out.Curious.
Anyway, the source of my information regarding Angelina is simply my own observations. ...her breasts, beautiful as they look, scarcely so much as jiggle in her all-nude dance/modelling scene in Gia. Like roaches and Australians, they'll probably survive the next war.
(Oh, and since I've been getting a lot of mail about that last line, know that it's simply a reference to Cold War lore which holds that the only living things likely to survive a nuclear conflict between the U.S. and the U.S.S.R. are cockroaches and Australians, the former because of their general hardiness, the latter because of their geographic location (the winds supposedly won't blow the nuclear fallout as far as Australia). I'm not otherwise trying to compare roaches and Australians. Mellow out, mate.)