recap Silence Of The Lamb p1 :
There was a lot of debate on the forums cool I want to read that about whether the parents should have switched the kids back, with a significant number of people under the impression that the error wasn't discovered until the kids were four.
well yeah they said the settlement was 1992 (kids born 1988) and when Mac said Why didn't they just switch us back? We would have gotten over it eventually?, V said "Suppose they had gotten pretty attached those first four years?"
so I think this must have been an oversight:
I hate to bring this up, but the first line of the story Veronica found reads "After [four or five, I couldn't really tell] years of legal battles..." So first off, the hospital didn't settle? As if. Second, that means that the parents knew about the error in short order after it happened. There was a lot of debate on the forums about whether the parents should have switched the kids back, with a significant number of people under the impression that the error wasn't discovered until the kids were four. Pretty eagle-eyed of me, considering that without contacts, my vision is 20/Holy shit, are you seriously that blind? heh.
I was held up slightly by the upcoming "you were switched w a baby born one day after you." bcs, wldn't their known birthdays be switched? the moms would know when they were in labor! so the girls grew up with the birthdays their moms remember as the day they gave birth, which was really to the other girl.
right? let's see if couchbaron addresses this.. nope (but maybe in the forums someone mentions it?):
recap Silence Of The p6: Mac asks if she's adopted, and says it would explain a lot if she were. Veronica lays out the baby-switching, and tells her that a girl born the day after she was went home with her real parents. Dawning horror on her face, Mac blurts, 'I was switched at birth...with [Makeup, Makeup, Makeup!] Madison Sinclair?'
...
recap Silence Of The p8
Mac hands Veronica an invitation to M,M,M!'s party, and asks her to crash it with her. The invitation is in 09er code. Man, I want to marry the continuity editor.
so back on p1, he did indeed mean to blame the continuity (/timing) error on network execs *as distinct from* the show makers: Veronica references M,M,M!'s birthday as a "rite of fall," so put a tick mark on your scorecard under "Errors Of Continuity Caused By Candy-Assed Programming Executives." bcs this episode was delayed, so that it Aired on 2005.01.04 when had been planned to air before AEFC (and, I guess, before a December hiatus of several weeks)
Mac won't be deterred: "It's my chance to see how the other half lives, especially since I should have been the other half." Yeah, I feel really sorry for you. People as talented at web design as you are never make any money. & earlier cbaron commented to same effect when she pulled out a powerbook. that he d n know the expression was 'rich little poor girl.'
Party. Wallace is accompanying Mac and Veronica. M,M,M! opens the door, and the three of them are all festive in wishing her a happy birthday. Hee. M,M,M!, horrified, asks why they're there. Wallace: "I came to celebrate your birth, but these two just want to hook up."
Mac checks out pictures of the fam in Egypt. She goes into the study library, where she discovers a BRUNETTE younger sibling. Again, the casting director deserves a raise. Getting a brunette girl is one thing, but this girl is exactly like Mac.
Veronica pulls up to Mac's house, Mac in the passenger seat. Mac bitterly wonders if M,M,M! has read even five books in that massive, beautiful library. I doubt it. I don't think 1001 Ways To Be A Massively Made-Up Bitch comes in leather-bound hardback. Mac rants on that she has a blood sister she's never known, and wonders why her parents didn't trade them back: "We would have gotten over it eventually." Well, I've gotten over the seventh season of Buffy, but that doesn't mean airing it was the right thing to do. Veronica wryly speculates that the parents got a little attached. Well, the ones who had Mac, anywaygood point. Mac wonders why they didn't figure it out before then, and I refer you to the microfilm.
Monday, June 18, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Archive
-
►
2019
(8)
- October 2019 (1)
- January 2019 (7)
-
►
2018
(11)
- December 2018 (1)
- November 2018 (1)
- October 2018 (2)
- May 2018 (4)
- March 2018 (3)
-
►
2017
(20)
- November 2017 (2)
- October 2017 (3)
- September 2017 (2)
- August 2017 (2)
- July 2017 (5)
- June 2017 (2)
- May 2017 (1)
- January 2017 (3)
-
►
2016
(17)
- December 2016 (1)
- October 2016 (2)
- September 2016 (4)
- June 2016 (1)
- May 2016 (3)
- April 2016 (5)
- February 2016 (1)
-
►
2015
(44)
- December 2015 (3)
- October 2015 (2)
- September 2015 (6)
- July 2015 (2)
- June 2015 (2)
- May 2015 (2)
- April 2015 (3)
- March 2015 (17)
- January 2015 (7)
-
►
2014
(61)
- December 2014 (6)
- November 2014 (4)
- October 2014 (4)
- September 2014 (4)
- August 2014 (11)
- July 2014 (1)
- June 2014 (4)
- May 2014 (18)
- April 2014 (9)
-
►
2013
(13)
- December 2013 (3)
- August 2013 (2)
- July 2013 (2)
- March 2013 (4)
- January 2013 (2)
-
►
2012
(26)
- December 2012 (3)
- October 2012 (1)
- August 2012 (2)
- July 2012 (4)
- June 2012 (2)
- May 2012 (2)
- April 2012 (6)
- March 2012 (1)
- February 2012 (4)
- January 2012 (1)
-
►
2011
(45)
- December 2011 (1)
- November 2011 (1)
- October 2011 (3)
- September 2011 (8)
- August 2011 (3)
- July 2011 (3)
- June 2011 (1)
- May 2011 (6)
- April 2011 (11)
- March 2011 (3)
- February 2011 (3)
- January 2011 (2)
-
►
2010
(60)
- December 2010 (1)
- November 2010 (2)
- October 2010 (4)
- September 2010 (8)
- August 2010 (5)
- June 2010 (3)
- May 2010 (18)
- April 2010 (4)
- March 2010 (2)
- February 2010 (7)
- January 2010 (6)
-
►
2009
(113)
- December 2009 (4)
- October 2009 (8)
- September 2009 (7)
- August 2009 (11)
- July 2009 (5)
- June 2009 (10)
- May 2009 (13)
- April 2009 (6)
- March 2009 (26)
- February 2009 (7)
- January 2009 (16)
-
►
2008
(275)
- December 2008 (4)
- November 2008 (4)
- October 2008 (57)
- September 2008 (24)
- August 2008 (25)
- July 2008 (15)
- June 2008 (16)
- May 2008 (23)
- April 2008 (35)
- March 2008 (18)
- February 2008 (31)
- January 2008 (23)
-
▼
2007
(584)
- December 2007 (13)
- November 2007 (29)
- October 2007 (23)
- September 2007 (20)
- August 2007 (55)
- July 2007 (72)
- June 2007 (90)
- May 2007 (67)
- April 2007 (46)
- March 2007 (75)
- February 2007 (72)
- January 2007 (22)
-
►
2006
(1064)
- December 2006 (31)
- November 2006 (77)
- October 2006 (83)
- September 2006 (179)
- August 2006 (64)
- July 2006 (59)
- June 2006 (43)
- May 2006 (117)
- April 2006 (79)
- March 2006 (125)
- February 2006 (96)
- January 2006 (111)
-
►
2005
(202)
- December 2005 (38)
- November 2005 (36)
- October 2005 (46)
- September 2005 (40)
- August 2005 (34)
- July 2005 (8)
No comments:
Post a Comment