5-10: "He's Our You" 2009.03.25 - TWoP Forums p11:
-Season 1-2-3-4 and first half of season 5 Ben (no matter what year) had no idea that Sayid shot him at age 12, because it hadn't happened yet. To Sayid or Ben. It just happened during this episode (no matter what year) and now we are safe to assume that 'just crashed on the hydra island and got lumped up by a boat oar thanks to action Sun' Ben NOW remembers it because it just happened. Remember when Desmond suddenly woke up with Penny and 'remembered' that Daniel Faraday knocked on the hatch door back in 2002 or 2003 or 2004? He didn't know Daniel Faraday did that until that point because it hadn't happened yet....again: Time does not equal a straight line.
-NotSure:
ITDA. From Ben's perspective, it HAD happened already: he was only 15 or so when it happened, and his personal timeline was much older in the first few seasons. It HAD NOT happened yet for Sayid: his personal timeline is only now reaching this point. So Ben would have remembered (barring amnesia), whereas Sayid would not. good. distinguish btw personal timeline (lifestream) and chronology.
And you can't compare any timeline issues of Desmond with anything that happens to anyone else. His circumstance is explicitly unique. right.
There is no 'alternate universe', no 'course correction' needed here. I joked earlier about Paradoxia, but I'm certain that either Ben is not dead or that he is fully revived somehow (naturally or supernaturally) and lives whatever life we have already seen him live. He was always shot by Sayid, and it seems likely that this contributed to his future mental issues. We are seeing the rich storyline of Sayid helping to create the monster he loathed.
good. int how the rxns to Lost this season seem to fall (too easily for me?) into 'gets it' or just doesn't. re the time. it's just irritating (mildly) to me to read the comments like above. I'm dismissive. if commenter does not understand or does not subscribe to 'whatever happened, happened.' (or: the 12 monkeys theory of time. closed loop.) it seems like not understanding, rather than not subscribing, bcs have not read a well writ proposal of an alternative theory. always just seems confused, like the person has not thought it through.
unclosed loops just don't make any sense to me. very basic. says x does not equal x. the back to the future model just does not seem to take time seriously. it pretends it's not what it is.
this is really the same allegiance as my old one to what I found articulated in Leibniz (the notion of the person containing evth the person does as certain; d n mean un-free), and really even in Heidegger and back to Aristotle: what is, is.
anyway I've enjoyed Lost bcs seems totally in the whatever happened, happened world; which is any world I've yet seen as possible. so tonight was a shocker. maybe my first experience of actually being left hanging, as from a cliff. actually unhappy that have to wait a week to see, what? twop p1 "Uh, that can't happen, can it?" but it did! now relieved by having seen that next week's episode is *called* Whatever Happened, Happened. (and by having read tvguide's logline.) nice move having the next episode an explicit (in the title!) answer to the seeming challenge in this episode to the time theory.
I do think it will be tough to convincingly present Sayid's shot as not fatal. I mean, if anyone is a sure shot, it's Sayid, right? He is the most skilled, accurate, capable, proficient character ~ever. and that was a shot at close-ish range to the chest, left side. Sayid wld know how to hit the heart.
but what maybe no one is a sure shot? and the island protects its children. (still, while the island may be the power that saved Locke's life when Ben shot him at the pit, the island only had to be the luck that Locke was shot where his missing kidney was not. so, his surviving was accomplished through ~natural means. )
I thought this episode was a heck of a show.
mainly: the scenes with Sayid and young Ben.
father Roger berating Ben, Sayid in his cell rising to his feet. the humanity he showed to the kid, along with the decision yes to kill him.
I liked Sayid here more than I ever have. appreciated getting to be be confident in how totally sharp this char is. 'nothing much gets past this guy.' no.
if there's a way to get the drop on these Dharma folks, he will. 'get the drop' ~?
~better than Jack Bauer, why? because his gaze seems more strikingly intelligent, taking everything in.
with the suspense of the end dulled by looking at tvguide for upcoming two episodes, the remaining question for me is, how did what we saw in tonight's flashbacks explain Sayid's turn from working for Ben to telling Hurley never to trust him? he was left seeming lost and alone when Ben said their work was done. "what will I do now?" "live your life. you are free." and then what, because left with his guilt, he was disgusted with Ben and with himself for doing his bidding? and~or Ben then showing up & telling him that who he is is a killer, that made him disgusted with working for this "liar and manipulator" as he said to Illana? point is: we did not see anything overt to cause a turn, no revelation of a lie or manipulation by Ben that undercut their alliance. just the way Sayid probably always felt about Ben coming to the fore? once the work was not providing a way at channelling his grief over Nadia. or did I miss sth? Sayid did not discover anything new about Ben in the flashbacks, did he? .............it's as if I missed a revelation that Ben had set Sayid up to think that Widmore's people, who they were allied against & Sayid was killing on Ben's orders, had killed Nadia. when in fact Ben had. *that* would explain Sayid's total turn against Ben the manipulator. it wld so well answer my qstn here that I am just about convinced I did somehow miss that. (cld have been said in the moments after a commercial break that I was flipping to other channgels? how do I miss sth like that in moments? that's huge. but it seems it must have happened. or: it was not revealed here, but will be. ~ I dunno. if Ben actually is responsible for Nadia's death, and Sayid knew that, hard to believe adult Sayid would not have immediately killed adult Ben, not calmly spoken to him when he showed up in Santo Domingo.)
...numerous notes at dlcs pagemarks of twop thread p1-4, 11, 13-16
Wednesday, March 25, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Archive
-
►
2019
(8)
- October 2019 (1)
- January 2019 (7)
-
►
2018
(11)
- December 2018 (1)
- November 2018 (1)
- October 2018 (2)
- May 2018 (4)
- March 2018 (3)
-
►
2017
(20)
- November 2017 (2)
- October 2017 (3)
- September 2017 (2)
- August 2017 (2)
- July 2017 (5)
- June 2017 (2)
- May 2017 (1)
- January 2017 (3)
-
►
2016
(17)
- December 2016 (1)
- October 2016 (2)
- September 2016 (4)
- June 2016 (1)
- May 2016 (3)
- April 2016 (5)
- February 2016 (1)
-
►
2015
(44)
- December 2015 (3)
- October 2015 (2)
- September 2015 (6)
- July 2015 (2)
- June 2015 (2)
- May 2015 (2)
- April 2015 (3)
- March 2015 (17)
- January 2015 (7)
-
►
2014
(61)
- December 2014 (6)
- November 2014 (4)
- October 2014 (4)
- September 2014 (4)
- August 2014 (11)
- July 2014 (1)
- June 2014 (4)
- May 2014 (18)
- April 2014 (9)
-
►
2013
(13)
- December 2013 (3)
- August 2013 (2)
- July 2013 (2)
- March 2013 (4)
- January 2013 (2)
-
►
2012
(26)
- December 2012 (3)
- October 2012 (1)
- August 2012 (2)
- July 2012 (4)
- June 2012 (2)
- May 2012 (2)
- April 2012 (6)
- March 2012 (1)
- February 2012 (4)
- January 2012 (1)
-
►
2011
(45)
- December 2011 (1)
- November 2011 (1)
- October 2011 (3)
- September 2011 (8)
- August 2011 (3)
- July 2011 (3)
- June 2011 (1)
- May 2011 (6)
- April 2011 (11)
- March 2011 (3)
- February 2011 (3)
- January 2011 (2)
-
►
2010
(60)
- December 2010 (1)
- November 2010 (2)
- October 2010 (4)
- September 2010 (8)
- August 2010 (5)
- June 2010 (3)
- May 2010 (18)
- April 2010 (4)
- March 2010 (2)
- February 2010 (7)
- January 2010 (6)
-
▼
2009
(113)
- December 2009 (4)
- October 2009 (8)
- September 2009 (7)
- August 2009 (11)
- July 2009 (5)
- June 2009 (10)
- May 2009 (13)
- April 2009 (6)
- March 2009 (26)
- February 2009 (7)
- January 2009 (16)
-
►
2008
(275)
- December 2008 (4)
- November 2008 (4)
- October 2008 (57)
- September 2008 (24)
- August 2008 (25)
- July 2008 (15)
- June 2008 (16)
- May 2008 (23)
- April 2008 (35)
- March 2008 (18)
- February 2008 (31)
- January 2008 (23)
-
►
2007
(584)
- December 2007 (13)
- November 2007 (29)
- October 2007 (23)
- September 2007 (20)
- August 2007 (55)
- July 2007 (72)
- June 2007 (90)
- May 2007 (67)
- April 2007 (46)
- March 2007 (75)
- February 2007 (72)
- January 2007 (22)
-
►
2006
(1064)
- December 2006 (31)
- November 2006 (77)
- October 2006 (83)
- September 2006 (179)
- August 2006 (64)
- July 2006 (59)
- June 2006 (43)
- May 2006 (117)
- April 2006 (79)
- March 2006 (125)
- February 2006 (96)
- January 2006 (111)
-
►
2005
(202)
- December 2005 (38)
- November 2005 (36)
- October 2005 (46)
- September 2005 (40)
- August 2005 (34)
- July 2005 (8)
No comments:
Post a Comment