The Louis CK Talking To Dane Cook Scene Is Genuinely Important | Videogum - Posted on Aug 5th by Gabe
On last night’s episode of Louie, it’s Louie’s daughter’s birthday, so he gives her tickets to some make-believe bubble gum pop star’s concert, but it turns out his daughter prefers Lady Gaga. So Louie talks to his agent (played perfectly by a 9-year-old) to see if there’s a way to get tickets to see Lady Gaga, but the only comedian who shares her promotion company is Dane Cook. Wanting so badly to please his daughter, Louie goes to Madison Square Garden (or whatever) and visits him backstage. good sum. And what follows is the scene that I have posted after the jump, and it is amazing. (You almost certainly know the history behind this scene, but Dane Cook has very famously been accused of stealing Louis C.K.’s material.) First of all, it’s just a very good scene. It’s funny and well done and it makes for a good TV show. Second of all, it is important. For real. Not only is this one of the more interesting things to happen on television in a long time, but it has important things to say about the way that we lead our lives that people do not really talk about very much even just in the world much less on tv. Let’s watch the scene (again) and then let us unpack it, yes? Sure!
[videogum-hosted vid clip here] I watched full epsd megavid LouieS02e07 Oh Louie / Tickets love the expression of the kid agent at 10:25 min in; whole epsd v good; scene under discussn begins ~ 13:00 Louis & Dane conversation --------
Man. OK, so, first of all, congratulations to everyone involved on this. I am not a Dane Cook fan personally but he gets Big Points for this. Yes, it allows him to tell his side of the story, which he has never really done before (unless he did it on Marc Maron’s podcast or something, but that episode was before my time and I do not pay for podcasts, no offense podcasts none taken :) enjoyed that before watching the show, as a direct address *to*: podcasts, then watched & realized was reference (probably! right?) to th show in wh Louie says to Bob Saget on set of sitcom that he shld not be there playing the best friend bcs Louie wld not hang out with this guy no offense Saget "none taken") and he comes off looking much better for it yes, but somehow the scene is impressively generous to BOTH of these dudes. The scene does not play out at anyone else’s expense. It really is as open and honest of a thing as scripted television can be.
This is a scene about forgiveness, acceptance, self-examination, fatherhood, fame, courage, honesty, and mortality. That’s a lot! Those are REALLY important things! What this scene says, at least I think, is that no matter what other people do in life, you need to be responsible for your own behavior. There are people in this world who are victims of terrible crimes, that is not what we are talking about here. This is about confronting and acknowledging the thousand cuts slights that we are constantly exchanging. As often as not, our reaction to being injured is to injure others, and that is a losing scenario for everyone involved.
Of course, what makes this scene even more interesting is a momentary consideration of the history leading up to it. Not just the “Dane Cook is a joke thief” thing, but the fact that is ultimately ancient herstory at this point, and that Louis C.K. continued to press on and do his job, and he now has a successful television show and sells out Carnegie Hall. He is, by all accounts, hugely successful in his own right. This doesn’t diminish what Dane may or may not have done (and I think the itchy asshole moment in this scene is one of the better descriptions of the ways in which sometimes people do just get the same ideas about things because no duh) but it does suggest that at the end of the day everyone needs to just keep going, and if you wallow in self-pity or you focus on negative things that might slow you down you will never get to confront your own Dane Cook on your own FX show. You know what I mean.
UPDATE: I just had a discussion w a friend of mine who disagreed w me on pretty m all pnts about this scene, & that is totally reasonable & he had a lot of good things to say in defense of his position, but one of his main grievances besides evth I said / :) / was w my use of th word “important” & I do think that our discussn helped clarify for me a little wh I mean by th, bcs in a lot of ways it is clearly th least “important” thing th has ever happened. / :) / I guess wh I mean is that, for me, this scene was interesting and meaningful, and that seems like a huge accomplishmnt considering th we are talking about a sitcom. dealing w very niche subject matter. And so the way that this scene is “important” is as an example of wh is poss in creating resonance within th context of television, or comedy, or narrative, or art, or what have you. More things shld be like that. I don’t know, I just felt like adding this clarificatn. Donate to children living in war-torn Sudan here.
-lakonislate: Communication. Actually saying things you mean out loud and accepting that it might make you uncomfortable. That’s what I think makes this scene important.
Although of course anything most of us say ever can easily be trivialized by insinuating they’re White People Problems, or something like that (I’m looking at you, Gabe’s friend).
-re: the UPDATE… TV is a mass communication media, and, It’s ridiculous to imply that nothing it does is important unless it directly feeds starving kids or ends war. TV comedy, e.g., Stephen Colbert, affects things like society and politics, which affects the world. Daily starvation and killing are themselves just collateral damage of these larger forces. How we tell our stories is who we are.
Friday, August 26, 2011
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Archive
-
►
2019
(8)
- October 2019 (1)
- January 2019 (7)
-
►
2018
(11)
- December 2018 (1)
- November 2018 (1)
- October 2018 (2)
- May 2018 (4)
- March 2018 (3)
-
►
2017
(20)
- November 2017 (2)
- October 2017 (3)
- September 2017 (2)
- August 2017 (2)
- July 2017 (5)
- June 2017 (2)
- May 2017 (1)
- January 2017 (3)
-
►
2016
(17)
- December 2016 (1)
- October 2016 (2)
- September 2016 (4)
- June 2016 (1)
- May 2016 (3)
- April 2016 (5)
- February 2016 (1)
-
►
2015
(44)
- December 2015 (3)
- October 2015 (2)
- September 2015 (6)
- July 2015 (2)
- June 2015 (2)
- May 2015 (2)
- April 2015 (3)
- March 2015 (17)
- January 2015 (7)
-
►
2014
(61)
- December 2014 (6)
- November 2014 (4)
- October 2014 (4)
- September 2014 (4)
- August 2014 (11)
- July 2014 (1)
- June 2014 (4)
- May 2014 (18)
- April 2014 (9)
-
►
2013
(13)
- December 2013 (3)
- August 2013 (2)
- July 2013 (2)
- March 2013 (4)
- January 2013 (2)
-
►
2012
(26)
- December 2012 (3)
- October 2012 (1)
- August 2012 (2)
- July 2012 (4)
- June 2012 (2)
- May 2012 (2)
- April 2012 (6)
- March 2012 (1)
- February 2012 (4)
- January 2012 (1)
-
▼
2011
(45)
- December 2011 (1)
- November 2011 (1)
- October 2011 (3)
- September 2011 (8)
- August 2011 (3)
- July 2011 (3)
- June 2011 (1)
- May 2011 (6)
- April 2011 (11)
- March 2011 (3)
- February 2011 (3)
- January 2011 (2)
-
►
2010
(60)
- December 2010 (1)
- November 2010 (2)
- October 2010 (4)
- September 2010 (8)
- August 2010 (5)
- June 2010 (3)
- May 2010 (18)
- April 2010 (4)
- March 2010 (2)
- February 2010 (7)
- January 2010 (6)
-
►
2009
(113)
- December 2009 (4)
- October 2009 (8)
- September 2009 (7)
- August 2009 (11)
- July 2009 (5)
- June 2009 (10)
- May 2009 (13)
- April 2009 (6)
- March 2009 (26)
- February 2009 (7)
- January 2009 (16)
-
►
2008
(275)
- December 2008 (4)
- November 2008 (4)
- October 2008 (57)
- September 2008 (24)
- August 2008 (25)
- July 2008 (15)
- June 2008 (16)
- May 2008 (23)
- April 2008 (35)
- March 2008 (18)
- February 2008 (31)
- January 2008 (23)
-
►
2007
(584)
- December 2007 (13)
- November 2007 (29)
- October 2007 (23)
- September 2007 (20)
- August 2007 (55)
- July 2007 (72)
- June 2007 (90)
- May 2007 (67)
- April 2007 (46)
- March 2007 (75)
- February 2007 (72)
- January 2007 (22)
-
►
2006
(1064)
- December 2006 (31)
- November 2006 (77)
- October 2006 (83)
- September 2006 (179)
- August 2006 (64)
- July 2006 (59)
- June 2006 (43)
- May 2006 (117)
- April 2006 (79)
- March 2006 (125)
- February 2006 (96)
- January 2006 (111)
-
►
2005
(202)
- December 2005 (38)
- November 2005 (36)
- October 2005 (46)
- September 2005 (40)
- August 2005 (34)
- July 2005 (8)
No comments:
Post a Comment